On Monday the Supreme Court sided positively with an online people search engine. The decision, for now, has protected these data providers from the ubiquitous and onerous law suits over small errors. A 6-2 ruling has set aside, for the time being, a class action. Is profile. This arises from an individual suing an online people search engine who generated wrong information. Describing him as having children, with a graduate degree, married and in his fifties. These details were incorrect.

His claim centered around the FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act). This calls for upwards to $1000 in damages. This sum for incorrect information over an individual’s creditworthiness. Many online people search providers providers have followed the case with interest. Online people search providers including Google and Facebook. Both concerned over possible class action lawsuits. If the claimant had been successful this would have potentially opened the flood gates. A vast class of individuals would have then have made the same claim. Fears were rife over alleged inaccuracies spawning a wave of lawsuits.

The decision though would appear to pivot around “reckless reporting” and “damaged reputations”. Advocates for Consumer rights had argued that companies who failed as such should be punished. The decision gave the data provider in question a partial victory. A ruling was set a side which cleared the claimant/plaintiff to sue in a class action. It directed judges to strongly consider whether the plaintiff could demonstrate “concrete and particularized” injury required for standing. The court put forward that all inaccuracies cause material risk or harm. An example was put forward as to how an inaccurate ZIP code could cause any real harm. The decision though does not close the case. It will now be referred back to lower courts. Thereafter the plaintiff’s lawyers may well attempt to prove damage to the plaintiff personally.

Please follow and like us:
RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Twitter

DISCLAIMER: Please note the content within this blog/site is for informational, educational and entertainment purposes and should not be construed or perceived as professional or legal advice in respect of any of the subject matter. Any information you may rely on you do so at your own risk. The site owner/s will not be held responsible or liable for any damages from or related to your use of content, information and blog posts. The site owner/s take reasonable care to ensure that the information contained within this site is complete and correct but does not warrant this to be the case and accepts no liability for any errors, spelling mistakes or omissions. Any opinion or information in this site are put forth by the site owner/s on the basis of information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but not verified independently.