The College criminal record questions should be restricted as it may well place barriers to higher education. John B. King Jr (U.S. Secretary of Education) will be promoting the proposal at UCLA The proposal to bring to an end the current admissions process format. Enquiries around the college criminal record process is seen as a deterrent to the completion of applications. Disproportionately those with criminal records are colored. The questions so early in the process further disadvantage those seeking an education. Notably The University of California (incl. Los Angeles and Berkeley Campuses) refrains from asking about criminal backgrounds. Further education should be an open road to personal fulfilment without obstacles at such an early stage. In the heightened awareness of background checks and ban the box the college criminal record process would appear to be in need of reform.
Federal government does have it’s hands tied over the college criminal record agenda. It does not have the mandate to impose what questions any college uses for screening. Furthermore the federal application for financial assistance has a question related to ‘criminal background’. The question (23) within FAFSA relates to drug possession and selling. The offense to have happened while in receipt of student aid. However removing this college criminal record section from the application requires an act of congress. Beyond The Box is a Federal report recommending colleges review their process. Whether the question can be stalled until post decision. College presidents all over the country will shortly be receiving a guide “Beyond the Box” from the DoE. The initiative calls for an objective view to engage with a diverse range of students irrespective of their shortcomings and any experience of the judicial system.
According to a study in 2015 by The Center for Community Alternatives two-thirds never finished their application. The application was for the State University of New York. The reason cited was over the convictions questions. Deputy under secretary for education comments that governemnt would like universities to think hard about the college criminal record format. If universities truly believe they still require clarity over a potential student’s criminal background can it be delayed until further down the process.
DISCLAIMER: Please note the content within this blog/site is for informational, educational and entertainment purposes and should not be construed or perceived as professional or legal advice in respect of any of the subject matter. Any information you may rely on you do so at your own risk. The site owner/s will not be held responsible or liable for any damages from or related to your use of content, information and blog posts. The site owner/s take reasonable care to ensure that the information contained within this site is complete and correct but does not warrant this to be the case and accepts no liability for any errors, spelling mistakes or omissions. Any opinion or information in this site are put forth by the site owner/s on the basis of information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but not verified independently.