The criminal records “Ban the box” ground swell of opinion makes more strides towards change. In Austin, Texas the seeds of a “Fair Chance Ordinance” initiative have been sown by a council member. The move seeks to bring to a close the criminal records check box mentality depriving so many of the opportunity to gainful employment. The council member (Greg Casar) further endorsed the policy in that potential applicants deserve a fair shot. The move is gathering momentum across the States creating opportunities for applicants with perhaps a checkered past or minor criminal records that are in no way relevant to the role applied for.
Employers can still carry out a criminal background check as and when they see fit and as required. If there are criminal records evident the employer still has the option to reject the application. However the initiative is seen by some as a double edged sword in that it may well be to the detriment of business growth within the city. If an employer refused to comply would this also leave them prone to civil liability.
The council will be seeking public comment towards the end of August (SpeakUpAustin). Those comments will then be collated and submitted to the council in September. Civil rights groups (not only in America) are pushing the “Ban the box” movement. The efforts are essentially job applications before and over and above criminal records.
Corporates who have already banned the box are Home Depot, The Target Corporation and WalMart. An article by NewsOK in July 2015 confirmed over 600,000 Americans leave prison each year. Between one in three (70>100 million) Americans have criminal records. This figure confirmed by The National Employment Law Center. The Poverty to Prosperity program also confirmed that 9 out of 10 employers along with 4 out of 5 landlords carry out a criminal background check.
Eleven cities have ran with “ban the box”, with eighteen states banning the box for governmental jobs. NewsOK also reported that men between the ages of 24>54 with criminal records make up one third of those out of work. This statistic confirmed a reduction of GDP in 2008 to $65 million (down $57 million).
DISCLAIMER: Please note the content within this blog/site is for informational, educational and entertainment purposes and should not be construed or perceived as professional or legal advice in respect of any of the subject matter. Any information you may rely on you do so at your own risk. The site owner/s will not be held responsible or liable for any damages from or related to your use of content, information and blog posts. The site owner/s take reasonable care to ensure that the information contained within this site is complete and correct but does not warrant this to be the case and accepts no liability for any errors, spelling mistakes or omissions. Any opinion or information in this site are put forth by the site owner/s on the basis of information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but not verified independently.