In keeping with the recent feverish activity on gun control and background check clearance The Obama Administration is mulling plans to ban social security beneficiaries who rely on a fiduciary i.e. claimants who can not manage their finances and/or affairs. Therefore placing social security dependents in the same bracket as drug addicts, felons and illegal immigrants. There are millions without the mental capacity who rely on others to manage their disability payments.
There are already laws in place forbidding certain profiles from gun ownership, that being “marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition or disease” therefore those in receipt of benefits may well be swallowed up in the gun ban. The blanket coverage will see those beneficiaries reported to The NICS (National Instant Criminal Background Check System) (NICS).
Ideas currently being considered is to assimilate The Department of Veterans Affairs standards to Social Security beneficiaries in that a background check is mandatory for gun purchases. The number of adults currently in receipt of benefits is around 4.2 million.
The plan to align social security beneficiaries to the background check system does have it’s critics. Among them mental health experts, gun rights lobbies and those in the disabled corner. They claim that extending a background check to an individual who is financially incompetent is misguided. An individual who is financially incompetent is not potentially violent, unsafe or a danger to society by default.
The reports are also well founded in that they are put forward by a Yale psychiatrist, Dr Marc Rosen. Dr Rosen has spent time studying veterans who have mental health issues and how those individuals manage their money. The background check initiative is another step in curbing gun ownership. Especially following the Sandy Hook mass killings in 2012. Is this a step too far and no more than excluding gun ownership to individuals who have difficulty ‘balancing the books’.
DISCLAIMER: Please note the content within this blog/site is for informational, educational and entertainment purposes and should not be construed or perceived as professional or legal advice in respect of any of the subject matter. Any information you may rely on you do so at your own risk. The site owner/s will not be held responsible or liable for any damages from or related to your use of content, information and blog posts. The site owner/s take reasonable care to ensure that the information contained within this site is complete and correct but does not warrant this to be the case and accepts no liability for any errors, spelling mistakes or omissions. Any opinion or information in this site are put forth by the site owner/s on the basis of information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but not verified independently.